最新のC-DBADM-2601問題集で試験を準備する

SAP C-DBADM-2601 試験概要:

SAP C-DBADM-2601 試験シラバストピック:

SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA 認定 C-DBADM-2601 試験問題：

1. A regional nonprofit services provider uses SAP HANA for daily service utilization reporting. SAP HANA cockpit shows that a memory-related alert rule is triggered during the early reporting window, but the operations mailbox does not receive the expected notification. The database remains available, and dashboard users do not report failures. During review, the administrator notices that the alert appears in the monitoring view, but the notification assignment used by the operations team was not confirmed after a recent administration cleanup.
The constraint is that the administrator must restore reliable alert handling before the next reporting window. The team needs proof that monitoring detection and notification delivery are both working, not only that the alert is visible in cockpit.
Which action best addresses the alert handling gap?

A) Restart the database so alert rules and notification assignments are reloaded during the next startup cycle.
B) Close the alert because SAP HANA cockpit already displays it and the database remains available for reporting users.
C) Verify the notification assignment for the triggered alert, correct the missing assignment, and validate that a new alert event reaches operations.
D) Increase the alert threshold so the memory-related event occurs less often during the reporting window.

2. A regional freight operator uses SAP HANA for dispatch analytics. After a storage maintenance activity, SAP HANA cockpit shows that backup scheduling is still active, but the next backup job fails with an access message for the configured backup location. The backup catalog still lists earlier successful backups, and the operations team suggests proceeding because historical backup evidence remains visible.
The constraint is that the administrator must restore backup execution readiness before the next reporting cutover. The team must not confuse catalog visibility with the ability to create and retrieve new backup artifacts after the storage change.
What should the administrator do next?

A) Increase the backup schedule frequency so a later job can succeed without changing the storage configuration.
B) Validate and correct access to the configured backup location, then run and verify a new backup job.
C) Accept the backup state because the catalog still displays earlier successful backup entries.
D) Restart SAP HANA cockpit so the failed backup status can be cleared from the monitoring view.

3. A regional diagnostics provider uses SAP HANA for laboratory operations analytics. The administrator performs a recovery rehearsal in a validation environment. The restore completes, but the validation notes show that the recovery used a backup chain selected from a manually exported catalog snapshot. The live backup catalog contains a newer log entry that was not included in the exported snapshot. The operations manager wants to accept the rehearsal because the database opened successfully.
The constraint is that the administrator must validate recovery using evidence that reflects the current backup catalog. The rehearsal must prove the recoverable state without relying on stale catalog metadata.
What should the administrator do next?

A) Rerun recovery selection using the current backup catalog, restore to the required point, and validate the recovered state.
B) Accept the rehearsal because the restored database opened successfully in the validation environment.
C) Ignore the newer log entry because the exported catalog snapshot was available when the restore began.
D) Create a new manual catalog export and attach it to the completed rehearsal without repeating recovery.

4. A regional print services company is rehearsing a phased migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The export completes, the target database is reachable, and database explorer confirms that sample queries return dat a. During review, the administrator finds that the rehearsal workbook does not include a comparison of administration checks between the source system before export and the cloud target after import. The project lead wants approval because the query results are correct.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove operational transition readiness, not only data access. The validation pattern must show that source administration evidence and target administration evidence were captured at the correct points in the migration sequence.
Which recommendation is most appropriate?

A) Repeat the source export because missing administration comparison means the data movement failed.
B) Approve the rehearsal because successful target queries prove that the migrated data is usable.
C) Capture source pre-export administration evidence and target post-import administration evidence, then approve only after both are validated.
D) Defer administration comparison until production cutover so the rehearsal can focus only on transfer completion.

5. CHALLENGE 3 - Modernization Readiness Boundary Control
The modernization lead wants the SAP HANA Cloud database included in the same readiness status as the plant rollout systems because it is provisioned and has a small replicated test dataset. The cloud environment has not completed the monitoring or recovery evidence package used for plant reporting systems. What is the best response?

A) Use the pilot system monitoring record as the SAP HANA Cloud readiness record.
B) Keep cloud planning evidence separate until cloud-specific administration validation is completed.
C) Stop modernization planning until the current plant rollout wave is fully completed.
D) Include the cloud database in the same readiness status because provisioning and test data show progress.

質問と回答：