SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA 認定 C_DBADM 試験問題:

1. A financial services operations team notices that one SAP HANA database appears healthy in routine availability checks, yet a scheduled administration task fails each morning for only one administrator group. Database monitoring shows normal runtime status, and no general service interruption is visible. Another team member proposes reactivating the failed task definition because the symptom appears limited to that operation.
The lead administrator is concerned that the issue may sit upstream of the task itself and wants the first corrective action to restore execution without masking the actual dependency failure. The environment supports both cockpit-style checks and detailed administration review.
What is the best first action?

A) ecreate the scheduled task because a failed execution usually indicates the task object is no longer valid.
B) alidate whether the affected administrator group still has the required access scope for the task and correct that dependency before changing the task definition.
C) estart the database services used by the task because healthy monitoring does not rule out a short-lived runtime inconsistency.
D) ncrease the task retry interval so the operation has more time to complete under the current runtime state.

2. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 &#x2014; Cloud Migration Readiness Separation</strong> The modernization lead wants the SAP HANA Cloud database included in the same release readiness status because it is provisioned and has a limited activation dataset. The cloud environment has not completed the startup, monitoring, or recovery evidence package used for active UAT systems. What is the best response?

A) nclude the cloud database in the same status because provisioning and limited data show progress.
B) top cloud planning until the current UAT release decision is fully completed.
C) eep cloud migration evidence separate until cloud-specific administration validation is completed.
D) se the upgraded reporting system&#x2019;s monitoring record as the SAP HANA Cloud readiness record.

3. A food processing company is preparing for a weekend resilience test in a mixed SAP HANA landscape. The on-premises database supports operational processing, while a SAP HANA Cloud database is used for planning and analysis. During the pre-test review, administrators confirm that backup jobs finished on schedule and recent recovery documentation is available.
However, the validation team notices that the documented recovery sequence was not updated after a recent administration change, and the current procedure now assumes an execution order that no longer matches the active landscape. The continuity lead wants the gap corrected before the test starts, but without redesigning the full recovery model.
What is the best next action?

A) tart the resilience test anyway because successful backup completion is the main indicator of recovery readiness.
B) ostpone all recovery testing until the entire mixed-landscape continuity approach can be rewritten from the ground up.
C) reate another full backup immediately because a fresher backup point reduces the effect of any documentation gap.
D) pdate the recovery sequence so it reflects the current operational order and validate that the documented steps still support the required recovery objective.

4. <strong>CHALLENGE 1 &#x2014; Hypercare Configuration Record Traceability</strong> The hypercare coordinator wants to accept the comparison because meter-reading exception dashboards opened successfully. The database team later confirms that the upgraded service reporting system&#x2019;s administration record does not reflect the configuration state used during testing. Which decision best supports readiness-quality evidence?

A) eplace the upgraded system record with the SAP HANA Cloud provisioning record.
B) se the comparison because report opening is sufficient evidence for service readiness.
C) reat the missing configuration evidence as unrelated because hypercare focuses on dashboard access.
D) pdate the administration record and reassess the hypercare comparison against the confirmed state.

5. <strong>CHALLENGE 2 &#x2014; Close Aggregation Monitoring Evidence</strong> Claims reserve aggregation ran longer than expected during close rehearsal. Some monitoring thresholds were copied from the prior monthly profile before the upgrade. The reporting lead wants immediate tuning before the next rehearsal. What should the database owner do first?

A) isable aggregation monitoring so the next rehearsal focuses only on report completion.
B) alidate current monitoring thresholds and preserve baseline evidence before approving tuning.
C) pply tuning immediately because the close aggregation runtime affects business timing.
D) ove aggregation tuning to SAP HANA Cloud because future reporting may transition there.

質問と回答：